Legal Opinion

Pillsbury-Washburn Flour Mills Co. v. Eagle

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 5, 1898No. 462PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.

1Opinion of the Court

BUNN, District Judge.

This suit is brought by the complainants, who, for many years, have been engaged in the manufacture of flour on a large scale at the city of Minneapolis, Minn., against the defendí mis, who are engaged as wholesale and retail grocers in the sale of flour at Chicago, til., to enjoin the defendants from using as a part of their brand placed upon their barrels and sacks containing flour the words “Minnesota Patent,” or “Minneapolis, Min-nesoi::.” or “Minneapolis, Minn.” The allegations of the complain-' aids’ bill, which are fully sustained by the evidence, are substan-tia…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. California Apparel Creators v. Wieder of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Shaver v. Heller & Merz Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  4. California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Windsor Beverages, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Oil City Refiners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API