Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1911No. Docket No. 39PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Clinton; Searl, J. Case by Jasper A. Burnham against the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action on the case, in which the plaintiff, a resident and business man of St. Johns, Mich., seeks to recover from defendant damages for a claimed wrongful ejection from one of its west-bound passenger trains, on the morning of August 26, 19Í0.

It appears that the plaintiff and his wife, who had been visiting near the city of Flint, came to Durand and took the defendant’s west-bound train No. 19, due to leave there at 9:45 a. m., for St. Johns. Neither of them had tickets. The plaintiff’s wife claims to have gone on the train, entered a car, taken her seat, and paid her fare, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Hufford v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hufford v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Ry. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Zagelmeyer v. Cincinnati, Saginaw & Mackinaw RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Humphrey v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edmunds v. City of GlasgowMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. C. H. Little Co. v. Cadwell Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API