Legal Opinion

Edmunds v. City of Glasgow

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1931No. 6,828PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff, the holder of a fl,000 bond issued by the defendant, recovered judgment thereon from which defendant appealed.

The action was tried to the court without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts showing: That at a special election held on January 12, 1909', the following question was submitted to the taxpayers of the town (now city) of Glasgow: “Shall the town of Glasgow issue bonds in the sum of $50,000' for the purpose of constructing a water plant and system for said town?” A majority of the taxpayers voting at the election voted in favor of the bond issue. Fifty bonds were issued…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Gunnison County Commissioners v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Stanly County v. ColerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Hauge v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Town of Climax v. BurnsideSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. City of South FultonTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Clerihew v. City of BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Truax v. Town of LimaMontana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API