Edmunds v. City of Glasgow
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
Plaintiff, the holder of a fl,000 bond issued by the defendant, recovered judgment thereon from which defendant appealed.
The action was tried to the court without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts showing: That at a special election held on January 12, 1909', the following question was submitted to the taxpayers of the town (now city) of Glasgow: “Shall the town of Glasgow issue bonds in the sum of $50,000' for the purpose of constructing a water plant and system for said town?” A majority of the taxpayers voting at the election voted in favor of the bond issue. Fifty bonds were issued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Gunnison County Commissioners v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Stanly County v. ColerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Hauge v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Town of Climax v. BurnsideSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Armstrong v. City of South FultonTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Clerihew v. City of BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Truax v. Town of LimaMontana Supreme Court · 1948