Legal Opinion
C. H. Little Co. v. Cadwell Transit Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1917No. Docket No. 23PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Assumpsit by the C. H. Little Company against the Cadwell Transit Company for breach of a contract to deliver sand and gravel. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This suit was brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract made between the B. & O. Sand & Gravel Company and the defendant, which contract was assigned by the B. & O. Sand & Gravel Company to the plaintiff. . It was agreed in open court that if plaintiff was entitled to recover anything it was the sum of $2,800.
The record bears out the following statement of facts which is taken from the brief of counsel :
“The contract was entered into April 3, 1912, between the defendant and C. S. Owen and J. T. Belanger, doing business as the B. & O. Sand & Gravel Company. It was to continue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. Eaton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Northwestern Cooperage & Lumber Co. v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Allen v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Voigt v. Murphy Heating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Burnham v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cuvrell (In Re F & T Contractors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982