Legal Opinion

Frederick v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1877PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Error to Marquette. Trespass on the case for damages. The facts are in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

This is an action on the case brought to recover damages for being unlawfully ejected and put off a train of cars by the conductor of the train. The evidence on the part of the plaintiff tended to show that on the evening of January 29th, 1876, he went to the regular ticket office of the defendant at Ishpeming and asked for a ticket to Marquette, presenting to the agent in charge of the office one dollar from which to make payment there*343for; that the agent received the money, handed plaintiff a ticket and some change, retaining sixty-five cents for the ticket, the regular fare to Marquette;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Downs v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. FixIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hufford v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Ry. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Murdock v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. McKay v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Monnier v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API