Stanford v. City of Ontario
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a portion of a judgment of nonsuit entered in an action for damages for personal injuries.
Viewing the evidence under the well-settled rules governing nonsuits 1 and in the light most favorable to plaintiff, we set forth the following pertinent facts.
In February 1966, Mrs. Mary Morrison, a resident of defendant City of Ontario (City) wished to connect her dwelling on East Fifth Street with the City’s common sewer system which ran underneath the street but did not extend as far as her home. A city ordinance required homeowners in Mrs. Morrison’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Reynolds v. WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Miller v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Cameron v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Bostrom v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.