Legal Opinion

Great American Insurance Company v. Byrd & Watkins Construction, Inc., George F. Bennett

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1980No. 78-1383PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

The appeal in this Tennessee diversity case concerns the effect of Tennessee Code § 48-1014 on the assumption of the “liabilities . . . unknown” of a dissolved corporation. 1 The District Court ruled that § 48-1014 barred any action against defend ant George F. Bennett based on such an undertaking, and granted summary judgment to him. Because § 48-1014 does not apply to an assumption such as Bennett has made, we reverse the judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.

I

Bennett, Watkins & Byrd, Inc. voluntarily dissolved itself in October, 1973. Among the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kradel v. Piper Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. United States v. Kayser-Roth Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989
  3. Swindle v. Big River Broadcasting Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Kradel v. Fox River Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Taylor v. Markus Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Markus Enterprises, Inc.)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API