Great American Insurance Company v. Byrd & Watkins Construction, Inc., George F. Bennett
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
The appeal in this Tennessee diversity case concerns the effect of Tennessee Code § 48-1014 on the assumption of the “liabilities . . . unknown” of a dissolved corporation. 1 The District Court ruled that § 48-1014 barred any action against defend ant George F. Bennett based on such an undertaking, and granted summary judgment to him. Because § 48-1014 does not apply to an assumption such as Bennett has made, we reverse the judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.
I
Bennett, Watkins & Byrd, Inc. voluntarily dissolved itself in October, 1973. Among the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Kradel v. Piper Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Kayser-Roth Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989
- Swindle v. Big River Broadcasting Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Kradel v. Fox River Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Taylor v. Markus Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Markus Enterprises, Inc.)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.