Legal Opinion

Kradel v. Piper Industries, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2001PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BarkerWilliam M. Barker, J.

in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and JANICE M. HOLDER, JJ., joined.

Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 23, this Court accepted certification of five questions of law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concerning Tennessee’s law of corporations. For the reasons given herein, we answer that the corporate statutes in effect before January 1,1988, apply to determine the rights and remedies available against a corporation dissolved before that date and that section 48-l-1013(a) (repealed) applies to limit…

3Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Penley v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lavin v. JordonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by53 opinions

  1. House v. Estate of EdmondsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Sanford v. Waugh & Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Bank/First Citizens Bank v. Citizens & AssociatesTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re HayesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2007
  5. Theta Properties v. Ronci Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API