Swindle v. Big River Broadcasting Corp.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
FARMER, Judge.
Appellant, Jo Swindle (“Swindle”), seeks review of the trial court’s judgment in favor of Appellees, Big River Broadcasting Corporation (“Big River”), and the officers and directors of Big River, Sam Phillips, Sally Wilboum, S. Knox Phillips, and Jerry Phillips.
Swindle presents the following issues for review:
1. The GhanceEor’s finding that plaintiffs claim was barred by the statute of limitations is contrary to the preponderance of the evidence.
2. The Chancellor’s finding that the corporation made adequate provision for the payment of plaintiffs claim was contrary to the weight…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alpine Property Owners Ass'n v. Mountaintop Development Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Soo Line Railroad Ex Rel. Minnesota v. B.J. Carney & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Davis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1989
- M.S. v. Dinkytown Day Care Center, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Licht v. Association Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kradel v. Piper Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Ballard Square Condo. Owners Ass'n v. Dynasty Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Ballard Square Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Dynasty Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Bell v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.