McClatchy v. Laguna Lands Limited
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion for a change of the place of trial from San Joaquin County to Fresno County.
The action is for the abatement of an alleged public nuisance and for an order restraining the defendants from doing any of the acts mentioned in the complaint, and is brought under the provisions of an act of the legislature in effect August 10, 1913. (Stats. 1913, p. 252.) The act provides for the creation of a drainage district to be known as Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, describing its boundaries, the appointing of a reclamation board for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thornton v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. Selby Smelting and Lead Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Ruff v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Walker v. ShepardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
- Drinkhouse v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Claremont v. KruseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- O'HAGEN v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- City of Costa Mesa v. SofferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. ADCO AdvertisersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Williams v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.