Legal Opinion
O'HAGEN v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 9, 1971No. Civ. 27875PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered upon a denial of a petition for writ of mandate.
Plaintiff petitioned the Superior Court of Sonoma County for a writ of mandate to compel the City of Santa Rosa (hereinafter “the City”), the Board of Zoning Adjustment of said City (hereinafter “the Board”), and the Santa Rosa City Council (hereinafter “the Council”) to' annul and rescind the action revoking a use permit previously granted by the City for the operation of a drive-in restaurant. The trial court entered a judgment denying the writ of mandamus.
Factual…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- City of West Hollywood v. Beverly Towers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
- Goat Hill Tavern v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- City and County of San Francisco v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.