Legal Opinion

Vargas v. Trainor

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 27, 1974No. Nos. 74-1823, 74-1968PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TONE, Circuit Judge.

The procedure by which the Illinois Department of Public Aid reduced or terminated certain public assistance to aged, blind, and disabled recipients is challenged under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We hold that the procedure did not conform to constitutional standards and reverse the District Court’s contrary judgment.

Until the end of the year 1973, needy, blind, and disabled persons in Illinois received cash assistance from the Illinois Department of Public Aid. The Federal Government provided 50 percent of the funds for these payments through the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Ohio v. Madeline Marie Nursing HomesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Kapps v. WingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. White v. RoughtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Gloria Banks v. James L. Trainor, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Reeve Aleutian Airways, Inc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API