Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Eichler
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 9, 1986No. 85-5606PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Chief Judge.
This appeal requires us to decide two major questions relating to procedures used by Delaware for denying or terminating Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), Food Stamps and Medicaid benefits. We must first decide the extent of a pre-hearing notice required to be given by Delaware under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment; we must also decide the extent of confrontation of witnesses at the hearings. Delaware authorities are the appellants. They argue that the district court imposed notice requirements that are too detailed and that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- DeJohn v. Temple UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Intermetal Mexicana, S.A. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Salazar v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Bennett v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Spring Garden Associates, L.P. v. Resolution Trust CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.