Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Guerry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1929No. 19180PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where two attorneys were employed, by a trustee in bankruptcy, with the consent and approval of the referee, to advise and represent the trustee generally as in all matters in which the services of an attorney might thereafter be required, and the attorneys, in accepting such employment, agreed between themselves that they would divide equally such fees as should be earned in the proscution of such employment, such agreement between the attorneys would include fees earned in subsequent litigation, although the particular facts giving rise to such litigation might not have been in existence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Consaul v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Davenport v. WaggonerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Powers v. ManningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Underwood v. OverstreetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Bennett v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Venable v. BlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Stephens County v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Robinson v. GuerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API