Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Waggoner

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1926No. File No. 5389PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

In June, 1915, the defendants, practicing attorneys in Sioux ¡Falls, entered into a contract with one C. whereby they agreed to prosecute to final conclusion a claim for damages for personal injury against the Wisconsin Granite Company upon a contingent fee, their compensation to be a sum equal to 50 per cent of the ultimate recovery; necessary expenses being first deducted. Thereafter, and in September, 19x5, the defendants entered into a subsidiary contract with one Egan, who was also at that time a practicing attorney in Sioux Palls, which contract recites defendants’ previous agreement…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holmes v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Denver v. RoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Consaul v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Clinkscales v. Wisconsin Granite Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Egan v. WaggonerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. KriseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Royden v. ArdoinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In Re WoodworthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Stein v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API