Legal Opinion

Smith v. . McGovern

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1875PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This action was brought to recover commissions alleged to have been earned by plaintiffs firm as real- estate brokers. Plaintiffs evidence tended to establish that defendant placed in the hands of his firm for exchange certain premises situate in Hew York. Soon thereafter they showed him a lot of land owned by one Cameron, which the latter desired to exchange.

Read the full summary

This action was brought to recover commissions alleged to have been earned by plaintiffs firm as real- estate brokers. Plaintiffs evidence tended to establish that defendant placed in the hands of his firm for exchange certain premises situate in Hew York. Soon thereafter they showed him a lot of land owned by one Cameron, which the latter desired to exchange. Defendant authorized the firm to negotiate an exchange, he to receive a difference of $1,500, Cameron was willing to pay only $500. The firm afterward stated to defendant that if he would take $1,000 they could undoubtedly get Cameron…

1Opinion of the Court

Earl, C.,

reads for reversal.

All concur.

Order of General Term reversed and judgment on verdict affirmed.

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Langford v. IssenhuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. McCreery v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Ware v. . Dos PassosNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Farmer v. HolmesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Ellison v. Sudduth Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API