McCreery v. Green
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
May 3d, 1873, these parties agreed in writing as follows:
*175'‘‘The said Green for and in consideration of the promises on the part of the said McFarlan and McCreery hereinafter contained hereby agrees to start for the woods in the district of Bayfield, Wisconsin, and select and secure the entry at the U. S. land office or at the land office of the State of Wisconsin all the choice pine timbered lands he may be able to find subject to entry, not to exceed the amount of ten thousand acres (or more if the said McFarlan and McCreery so determine), which he may be able to find before the first day of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Booth v. . Spuyten Duyvil Rolling Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Beaubien v. CicotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Wilson v. Doehler-Jarvis Division of National Lead Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Goss v. LaninSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.