Gibson Auto Co. v. Finnegan
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
A proper determination of the questions raised requires us to state at some length the principal provisions of ch. 110, Stats, (emergency promotion of industrial recovery). It is evidently patterned after the National Industrial Recovery Act, ch. 90, 73d Congress, Sess. 1 (N. I. R. A.), 48 Stat. at L.,195.
Sec. 110.01, after declaring that an emergency exists, provides :
“It is hereby declared to be the policy of the legislature to remove obstacles to business recovery, to promote the organization of industry for the purpose of co-operative action among trade groups, to induce co-operation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- State ex rel. Mueller v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- State ex rel. Reynolds v. SandeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by26 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Van Winkle v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Heimerl v. Ozaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. WakeenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.