Legal Opinion

State v. Wakeen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1953PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The pertinent sections of the statutes are as follows:

151.04 (2) “No person shall sell, give away, barter, compound, or dispense drugs, medicines, or poisons, nor permit it, in a town, village, or city with a population of 500 or more unless he be a registered pharmacist, nor institute nor conduct a place therefor without a registered pharmacist in charge, except that a registered assistant pharmacist may do so under the personal supervision of a registered pharmacist, and may have charge during the pharmacist’s necessary absence, not to exceed ten days. If the population is less than 500,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  3. State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State ex rel. Kellogg v. CurrensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Madrid v. St. Joseph HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. StittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel v. Wisconsin Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API