Legal Opinion

State ex rel. New Mexico Judicial Standards Commission v. Espinosa

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2003No. 28,040PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAES, Chief Justice.

{1} Petitioners, members of the Judicial Standards Commission (Commission), filed a petition, for a writ of quo warranto with this Court, seeking to stop Governor Bill Richardson from removing the six lay members of the Commission and replacing them with new gubernatorial appointees. We issued a stay of any further business while we determined whether the Governor has the authority to remove prior gubernatorial appointees to the Commission. We hold that Article V, Section 5 of the New Mexico Constitution grants the governor the right to remove and replace lay…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Wiener v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Flaska v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State Ex Rel. Anaya v. McBrideNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Udall v. Colonial Penn InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. SmallwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  5. City of Las Cruces v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API