Legal Opinion

Katz v. New Mexico Department of Human Services

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1981No. 13177PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Chief Justice.

Beverly Katz applied to the New Mexico Department of Human Services (DHS) for Medicaid benefits for medical services rendered to her by a chiropractor and a physical therapist. The DHS denied her the benefits following an administrative hearing. She appealed the DHS ruling to the Court of Appeals which affirmed. We granted certiorari and affirm in part and reverse in part.

The issues presented are: (1) whether state and federal statutes and regulations require the DHS to pay for the services rendered by the chiropractor and the physical therapist; (2) whether the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Maher v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Beal v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. JAVIER M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Baker v. HedstromNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  5. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API