Legal Opinion

Pauley Petroleum, Inc. v. Continental Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 6, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

This is an appeal from an Order of the Superior Court quashing a writ of foreign attachment. The determinative question involves the correctness of the interpretation by the Court below of Superior Court Civil Rules 4(c) and 5(aa) (2), Del.C.Ann., as they existed on January 31, 1967 when the writ was issued.

I

The question presented requires tracing the evolution of certain changes in the subject Rules.

Prior to 1957, Rule 4(c) consisted of a main paragraph, dealing with the contents of writs generally, and three sub-paragraphs : one dealing with the writ of summons, the second…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weinress v. BlandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
  2. Weinress v. BlandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
  3. Beck v. Lund's Fisheries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  4. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  5. Empire Box Corp. v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. Continental Oil CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  2. Continental Oil Company v. Pauley Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  3. LNC Investments, Inc. v. Democratic Republic of CongoDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API