Weinress v. Bland
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Vice Chancellor:
The issue for determination is the validity of an order of sequestration.
Plaintiff instituted a stockholder’s derivative action against Universal Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware corporation (here called “Universal”) and a number of its officers and directors, one of whom is the defendant Morris H. Gotthilf (here called “Gotthilf”). In three of the counts of the complaint, plaintiff seeks a money judgment in excess of $500,000.00 against the individual defendants for acts of malfeasance. In the fourth count plaintiff seeks, inter alia, cancellation of Universal’s note…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Bank of Jasper v. First Nat. Bank of RomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jacobs v. TenneyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- U. S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
- U. S. Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Diversacon Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. F. Browne GreggCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Sands v. Lefcourt Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- Greene v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.