Legal Opinion
Weinress v. Bland
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided January 12, 1950PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
71 A.2d 59 (1950)
WEINRESS
v.
BLAND et al.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.
January 12, 1950.
Hugh M. Morris and Edwin D. Steel, Jr. (of Morris, Steel, Nichols & Arsht), Wilmington, for plaintiff.
John Van Brunt, Jr. (of Killoran & Van Brunt), Wilmington for defendant Morris H. Gotthilf, appearing specially.
Clair J. Killoran (of Killoran & Van Brunt), Wilmington for defendant Universal Laboratories, Inc.
SEITZ, Vice Chancellor.
The issue for determination is the validity of an order of sequestration.
Plaintiff instituted a stockholder's derivative action against Universal Laboratories, Inc.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Bank of Jasper v. First Nat. Bank of RomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Jacobs v. TenneyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- U. S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
- U. S. Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Diversacon Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. F. Browne GreggCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Sands v. Lefcourt Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- Greene v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.