Legal Opinion

Brownsburg Area Patrons Affecting Change v. Baldwin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1999No. 94S00-9803-CQ-144PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Brownsburg Area Patrons Affecting Change (BAPAC), and its founder John Patten sought a preliminary injunction from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The court denied the request, and BAPAC filed an interlocutory appeal for the Seventh Circuit.

Before resolving BAP AC’s claims, the Seventh Circuit certified a question of state law for this Court’s consideration, pursuant to Seventh Circuit Rule 52 and Indiana Appellate Rule 15(0). The question reads:

Does the Indiana Code’s definition of a “political action committee,” i.e., any…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Monitor Patriot Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Price v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Brian Majors v. Marsha AbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. ESPN, Inc. and Paula Lavigne v. University of Notre Dame Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hoesli v. Triplett, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. Hope Clinic v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API