Legal Opinion

Brian Majors v. Marsha Abell

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 23, 2003No. 02-2204PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPosner, Circuit Judge

An Indiana statute, challenged in this suit as an abridgment of free speech, requires that political advertising that “expressly advocat[es] the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate” include “adequate notice of the identity of persons who paid for ... the communication,” Ind. Code §§ 3 — 9 — 3—2.5(b)(1), (d), and makes violation a misdemeanor. The' district court dismissed the suit for lack of federal subject-matter jurisdiction on the ground that the noncandidate plaintiffs lacked standing and that as to the candidate plaintiffs the suit was moot.

The noncandidate plaintiffs…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. 281 Care Committee v. ArnesonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Arizona Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Betsy Bayless Janet Napolitano, in Her Official Capacity as the Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Lopez v. CandaeleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API