Legal Opinion
Huffman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1945No. 3074PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to section 205(a) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 56 Stat. 23, 58 Stat. 640, 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration instituted in the United States Court for Western Oklahoma an action against L. H. Pluffman to enjoin the demanding or *944receiving of rentals on certain properties in Oklahoma City in excess of those established by Maximum Rent Regulation No. 53. The defendant appeared, a hearing was had, and a preliminary injunction was granted. While the injunction was in force and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- United States Ex Rel. Brown v. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Taylor v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Rapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by6 opinions
- V. T. A., Inc. v. Airco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Hallinan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Woods v. FlissCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- V. T. A., Inc. v. Airco, Inc. v. Donnelly Mirrors, Inc., a Corporation, John S. Chapin, Third Party Ted Van Vorous and Vac-Tec Systems, Inc., a Corporation, Third Party v. T. A., Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant v. Airco, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff v. Donnelly Mirrors, Inc., a Corporation, Ted Van Vorous, and John S. Chapin, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.