Legal Opinion
Hallinan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1950No. 12424_1PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant appeared. as attorney for the defendant in a case entitled United States of America v. Bridges et al., D.C., 87 F.Supp. 14. The action was tried in the United States District .Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, Honorable George B. Harris, District Judge, presiding.
During the course of the trial a judgment of contempt was rendered against appellant. . He appeals, and makes the following principal contentions:
1. The record does not show contempt.
2. That by waiting one day subsequent to the commission of the alleged contempt, the Court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sunderland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Sprinkle v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. SacherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. LindholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Bobby G. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Steven v. Hershenow, Stuart M. Rosenthal, Steven A. ShraiarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- In the Matter of David DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers Appeal of Abraham E. Freedman, EsquireCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.