Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Bowles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1945No. 10509PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

Stanley Taylor, Isabelle D. Taylor and Evelyn Flynn, appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court, restraining them from violating Maximum Rent Regulation No. 28, issued under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 56 Stat. 23, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., hereinafter called the Act.1,2 This appeal is also from an order adjudging .ap*827pellant, Stanley Taylor, in contempt of court for violation of a temporary restraining order issued in the same action, The appellants, Stanley W. Taylor and Isabelle D. Taylor, are the owners of an apartment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Lockerty v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Taylor v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gray v. Commodity Credit CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
  2. Mayer v. BuchananDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Taylor v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Huffman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  5. Gertner v. NewrathDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API