Legal Opinion
City of Seattle v. Marshall
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1974No. 42650, 42651PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.
This is a consolidation of appeals from two *666separate convictions: (1) the appeal of Teresa Natale Marshall for conviction of directly participating in the asserted violation of Seattle Code 12.11.220; and (2) the appeal of James Lee Verdón for the conviction of aiding and abetting Teresa Natale Marshall and others in the asserted violation of the ordinance.
The appellants (defendants) were charged with violating the following ordinance:
12.11.220 Indecent exposure. It is unlawful for any person to appear in a state of nudity, or in any indecent or lewd dress, or make any indecent exposure of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kois v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SeesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- City of Seattle v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. HeinzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Koppinger v. City of FairmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- New Palm Gardens, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.