Legal Opinion

Koppinger v. City of Fairmont

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 26, 1976No. 46154PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Heard and considered en banc.

Kelly, Justice.

Plaintiff, Matthew Koppinger, owner and operator of the Safari Lounge in the city of Fairmont, Minnesota, appeals from a judgment dismissing his attempt to have a certain ordinance of that city declared unconstitutional on its face. We reverse.

Plaintiff, who owns a 3.2 beer bar and adjoining bowling alley, employs male and female performers to dance to accompanying prerecorded music for the entertainment of customers in his 3.2 beer establishment. Female performers often dance topless or completely nude. Male performers on occasion have danced…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SeesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. People v. GarrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Morris v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. McCaughtry v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API