Legal Opinion

People v. Carlos E.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 2005No. F045287PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, J.

In this matter of first impression, we determine whether Welfare and Institutions Code section 731 (further references are to this code unless stated otherwise), operative January 1, 2004, alters the method for determining the maximum term of confinement in the California Youth Authority (CYA). We find that, in light of the present language of section 731, the maximum term of a minor’s confinement must be discretionarily determined by the juvenile court based on the facts and circumstances placing the minor before the court, not to exceed the maximum time prescribed by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. A.R. (In re A.R.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. Alex N.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. Christian G.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. H.D.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. Joseph M.California Court of Appeal · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API