Legal Opinion

FountainCourt Homeowners' Ass'n v. FountainCourt Development, LLC

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2016No. CC C075333CV; CA A147420; SC S062691PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The supplemental judgment for garnishment is affirmed. The supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees, costs, and disbursements is reversed as to the attorney fee award and is otherwise affirmed.

BALDWIN, J.

American Family Mutual Insurance Company (AFM) seeks review of a decision of the Court of Appeals that upheld a trial court judgment in a garnishment proceeding requiring AFM to pay a judgment that plaintiffs FountainCourt Homeowners’ Association and FountainCourt Condominium Owners’ Association (FountainCourt) had obtained against AFM’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ferguson v. Birmingham Fire Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. West Hills Development Co. v. Chartis Claims, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Hunters Ridge Condominium Ass'n v. Sherwood Crossing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Bighorn Logging Corp. v. Truck Ins. Exch.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Twigg v. OpsahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API