Legal Opinion

Ledford v. Gutoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1994No. CC 16-90-07552; CA A73578; SC S40708PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.

This is an action for defense costs and indemnity brought by Raymond Kuhl as third-party plaintiff against his insurer, Northwest Farm Bureau Insurance Company (Northwest), as third-party defendant. Kuhl was a defendant in an action for malicious prosecution filed by Bill Ledford, in which the complaint (the Ledford complaint) alleged that Kuhl had willfully and maliciously instituted a prosecution of plaintiff because Kuhl “intended to harass, annoy, harm and cause expense to” Ledford and that Kuhl acted “for the purpose of injuring” Ledford.

Kuhl tendered defense of Ledford’s claim to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ferguson v. Birmingham Fire Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Isenhart v. General Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Nielsen v. St. Paul CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Blohm v. Glens Falls InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. American States Insurance Company v. Dastar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Marleau v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bresee Homes, Inc. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Northwest Pump & Equipment Co. v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API