Legal Opinion

Spooner v. Town of Topsham

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 4, 2009No. 08-236PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendant Town of Topsham appeals from a judgment of the Orange Superior Court, based on a jury verdict, that defendant discriminated because of age in failing to hire plaintiff James Spooner to the position of road foreman, in violation of 21 V.S.A. § 495(a)(1). Defendant argues that the court erred: (1) in admitting testimony of an investigator for the Vermont Attorney General’s office; (2) in failing to grant a new trial because of statements made by counsel for plaintiff; and (3) in failing to set aside the damage award. We affirm.

¶ 2. The basic facts are contained in our earlier…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brueckner v. Norwich UniversitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Quirion v. ForcierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. Havill v. Woodstock Soapstone Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spooner v. Town of TopshamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. Kobashigawa v. Silva.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Krag v. Uvm Med CtrVermont Superior Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API