Spooner v. Town of Topsham
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Defendant Town of Topsham appeals from a judgment of the Orange Superior Court, based on a jury verdict, that defendant discriminated because of age in failing to hire plaintiff James Spooner to the position of road foreman, in violation of 21 V.S.A. § 495(a)(1). Defendant argues that the court erred: (1) in admitting testimony of an investigator for the Vermont Attorney General’s office; (2) in failing to grant a new trial because of statements made by counsel for plaintiff; and (3) in failing to set aside the damage award. We affirm.
¶ 2. The basic facts are contained in our earlier…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brueckner v. Norwich UniversitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Quirion v. ForcierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Havill v. Woodstock Soapstone Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spooner v. Town of TopshamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Kobashigawa v. Silva.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
- Krag v. Uvm Med CtrVermont Superior Court · 2025