Kobashigawa v. Silva.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
NAKAYAMA, J.
When a trial judge makes an unequivocal ruling that evidence is admissible at trial, the party that had sought to exclude such evidence by means of a motion in limine need not renew its objection when that evidence is introduced at trial in order to preserve the objection for appellate review.
In this ease, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellants Lisa Kobashigawa and Margaret M. Kobashigawa (collectively, the Kobashiga-was) brought a negligence action against Defendant Joseph M.K. Silva and Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee City and County of Honolulu (the City) for…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McCardellTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- H. E. Collins and Joetta Collins, Surviving Parents and Personal Representatives of Karen Collins, Deceased v. Wayne CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. FavelMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Lawrence v. Mountainstar HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. Walton.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
- MICHAEL DASKALOPOULOS v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Medeiros v. Choy.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.