Legal Opinion

Kobashigawa v. Silva.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2013No. SCWC-30639PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

When a trial judge makes an unequivocal ruling that evidence is admissible at trial, the party that had sought to exclude such evidence by means of a motion in limine need not renew its objection when that evidence is introduced at trial in order to preserve the objection for appellate review.

In this ease, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellants Lisa Kobashigawa and Margaret M. Kobashigawa (collectively, the Kobashiga-was) brought a negligence action against Defendant Joseph M.K. Silva and Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee City and County of Honolulu (the City) for…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McCardellTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  4. H. E. Collins and Joetta Collins, Surviving Parents and Personal Representatives of Karen Collins, Deceased v. Wayne CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FavelMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Lawrence v. Mountainstar HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. State v. Walton.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  4. MICHAEL DASKALOPOULOS v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Medeiros v. Choy.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API