Legal Opinion

Follo v. Florindo

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 23, 2009No. 2007-322PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Defendants Paul Florindo and Susan Morency appeal from a jury verdict and judgment against them for common-law fraud and violations of Vermont’s Consumer Fraud Act in connection with their sale of a bed and breakfast business. Both defendants claim that the evidence did not support the verdict, that the jury instructions regarding common law and consumer fraud were plainly erroneous, and that the trial court’s decision to preclude their expert witnesses from testifying was error. Defendant Florindo also contends that it was error for the trial court to allow plaintiffs expert witness and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Brueckner v. Norwich UniversitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Poplaski v. LamphereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Monahan v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. Lent v. HuntoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. Cashdollar v. Mercy HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Pcolar v. Casella Waste Systems and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  2. Fly Fish Vermont, Inc. v. Chapin Hill Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. DeLeonardis v. PageSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  4. Ketchum v. Town of DorsetSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-JenkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API