Legal Opinion

Klingensmith v. Scioto Valley Traction Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiddleton, P. J.

The parties to this proceeding stand in the same relation to each other here as they did in the court below, where the plaintiffs in-, stituted this action for damages for the death of their decedent, which death they claimed was occasioned by various acts of negligence on the part of the defendant, the traction company. At the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence in the trial court, and on motion of the traction company, the court directed a verdict in favor of the latter, and this action constitutes the main error complained of here.

The plaintiffs offered evidence tending to prove the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Walsh v. Fitchburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. McAlpin v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Bottom's v. HawksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  5. Johnson v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Texas Utilities Electric Co. v. TimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. HOFF EX REL. HOFF v. Natural Refining Products Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Compton Ex Rel. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Dolata v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API