Legal Opinion

Dolata v. Ohio Edison Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1981No. 1032PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The Ohio Edison Company seeks to reverse the judgment rendered against it by a trial jury. Appellant argues that errors occurred during the course of the trial proceedings and that such errors were prejudicial in nature. Appellant’s contentions are as follows:

“1. The maintenance of an electric line 30 feet above the ground running through a tree at said height, said height being substantially in excess of the minimum vertical clearance prescribed by the National Electric Safety Code, breaches no legal duty to a person climbing in said tree.
“2. In an action for wrongful death, expert opinion…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Alabama Power Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Temple v. McComb City Electric Light & Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Chester Park Co. v. SchulteOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Daltry v. Media Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. FlippoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Brauning v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Suarez Ex Rel. Suarez v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Fortman v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Worley v. Cleveland Pub. PowerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API