Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Eagle River Union Free High School District

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 17, 1925:

Owen, J.

The bond of the surety company was furnished pursuant to the provisions of sec. 3327a, Stats. That statute, therefore, entered into and became a part of the bond. Baumann v. West Allis, 187 Wis. 506, 204 N. W. 907. That statute has recently received the frequent consideration of this court and is discussed in Webb v. Freng, 181 Wis. 39, 194 N. W. 155; Southern S. Co. v. Metro *524politan S. Comm. 187 Wis. 206, 201 N. W. 980, 204 N. W. 476; Southern S. Co. v. Hotchkiss, 187 Wis. 227, 201 N. W. 986; Building Contractors’ L. M. L. Ins. Co. v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Joint School District No. 4 v. Bailey-Marsh Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Builders Lumber & Supply Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  4. First National Bank of Crandon v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Baumann v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ramada Development Company, a Corporation v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  2. Gibbs v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Wiegel v. Sentry Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Onida Independent School Dist. No. 1 v. GrothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Graybar Electric Co. v. Manufacturers Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API