Legal Opinion

Town of Seekonk v. John J. McHale & Sons, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 6, 1950PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

The town is seeking to enforce against the defendants a provision in its zoning by-laws forbidding the use of “premises” in a “residence A district” “for any purpose except” certain enumerated purposes which do not include use as a gravel pit. The trial judge entered a decree enjoining all the defendants from excavating or stripping sand, gravel, and other materials from the land. The defendant corporation alone appeals. The evidence is reported.

It is exceedingly difficult to understand the evidence or even to delimit the land in question for the reason that the greater part of the testimony…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Wilbur v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Town of Billerica v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Schwoerer v. Boylston Market Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Butler v. Town of East BridgewaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. M. DeMatteo Construction Co. v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Township of Bloomfield v. BeardsleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Town of Brookline v. Co-Ray Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API