Legal Opinion

Town of Billerica v. Quinn

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 30, 1947PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The town seeks to enjoin the defendant from stripping the loam from a tract of about nineteen acres of land in violation of the town’s zoning by-law.

The facts appear from findings of the judge and from the evidence, which is reported. The by-law took effect on August 1, 1945. On July 29 the defendant placed a steam shovel on the premises and stripped the top soil from an area thirty to thirty-five feet wide and extending from one of the roads bounding the property back to a railroad that bisects it. He piled the soil upon the lot. His purpose was and is .to sell the loam. He asserts that by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Wilbur v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Building Commissioner v. McGrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. LaMontagne v. KenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Attorney General v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API