Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Bristol

Bristol County Circuit Court

Decided September 30, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE CHARLES B. FLANNAGAN, II

This matter is currently before the court on a motion for summary judgment.

The defendant City of Bristol, Virginia, contends that it is immune from suit because of the allegation that plaintiff’s damages resulted from negligence of the defendant in the maintenance or operation of a storm sewer system. The city contends that such a function is a governmental function for which the city enjoys immunity.

I am overruling the motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the city does not enjoy immunity for the negligent acts alleged.

First, plaintiff contends that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chalkley v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
  2. City of Norfolk v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  3. Burson v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  4. City of Richmond v. CheatwoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. Miller & Meyers v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Town of Front RoyalWarren County Circuit Court · 1996
  2. McLaughlin v. Town of Front RoyalWarren County Circuit Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API