Legal Opinion

Chalkley v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 12, 1891PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Error to judgment of circuit court of city of Eichmond, rendered February 28th, 1890, in an action of trespass on the case wherein the plaintiff in error, JB. D. Chalkley (general partner of himself and Isaac Davenport, Jr., B. D. Davenport and J. A. Morris, special partners in the style of B. D. Chalkley) is plaintiff, and the city of Eichmond is defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtFauntleroy, J.

*403The pleadings and the proofs presented by the record disclose the following case:

The firm - of B. 1). Ohalkley, manufacturers, importers, and dealers in leather and shoe findings, from the 20th day of August, 1885, to the 20th day of August, 1889, occupied, as their store, the storehouse Uo. 17 south Thirteenth street, situated on the east side of said street, between Main and Cary streets, with a cellar under it and several stories above. Under the sidewalk of the street, in front of the said cellar, about two and a half feet below the surface, and within about six inches of the wall of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashley v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. City of Bloomington v. BayIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Kiley v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. City of Chesapeake v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Taylor v. City of CharlottesvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API