Kinsman v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Judge.
This is a writ of certiorari to review the lawfulness of an award for noncompensable claim and denial of the petition for rehear- [ ing by the Industrial Commission of Arizona. The petitioner alleged a physical disability resulting from a coronary.
The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on appeal are as follows. Petitioner’s first episode of severe chest pain occurred while driving a bus for respondent company in 1957. In 1962 he was hospitalized at the Southern Pacific Hospital in San Francisco for "excision of a vocal cord polyp”, and the record available…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thiel v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Jones v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Hudgens v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Roberts v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Rabago v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rutledge v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- City of Phoenix v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Zambonini v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976