Legal Opinion

Kinsman v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 17, 1968No. 1 CA-IC 158PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Judge.

This is a writ of certiorari to review the lawfulness of an award for noncompensable claim and denial of the petition for rehear- [ ing by the Industrial Commission of Arizona. The petitioner alleged a physical disability resulting from a coronary.

The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on appeal are as follows. Petitioner’s first episode of severe chest pain occurred while driving a bus for respondent company in 1957. In 1962 he was hospitalized at the Southern Pacific Hospital in San Francisco for "excision of a vocal cord polyp”, and the record available…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thiel v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Jones v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hudgens v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Roberts v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Rabago v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. City of Phoenix v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Zambonini v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API