Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 12, 1969No. 1 CA-IC 199PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Judge.

This is a writ of certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona which found that the petitioner did not sustain an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment.

We are called upon to determine:

1. The date of the alleged accident.

2. Whether the disability of the petitioner is the result of an injury or accident arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment.

DATE OF THE INJURY

Petitioner has a history of heart difficulty and first suffered an “attack” in 1957. On 14 October 1966 the petitioner saw Dr. George Bascom for a check-up.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thiel v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Jones v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Sandoval v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Roberts v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Kinsman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sondag v. Ferris HardwareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Brock v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Rutledge v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Linn v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Pima Mining Company v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API