Legal Opinion

Zambonini v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 8, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1250PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NELSON, Presiding Judge.

We are called upon to determine two basic questions on review. The first question revolves around the sufficiency of the medical evidence to support the Industrial Commission award finding a non-compensable injury. The second question deals with whether the petitioner was within the course and scope of his employment when the injury occurred and whether the resultant injury arose out of his employment.

On February 23, 1973, while attending a conference in Show Low and Pinetop, Arizona, petitioner Bert Zambonini (Zambbnini), an employee of the Arizona Department…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bartlett v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Klein v. Terra Chemicals International, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Pottinger v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Lemmon v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API