Zambonini v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NELSON, Presiding Judge.
We are called upon to determine two basic questions on review. The first question revolves around the sufficiency of the medical evidence to support the Industrial Commission award finding a non-compensable injury. The second question deals with whether the petitioner was within the course and scope of his employment when the injury occurred and whether the resultant injury arose out of his employment.
On February 23, 1973, while attending a conference in Show Low and Pinetop, Arizona, petitioner Bert Zambonini (Zambbnini), an employee of the Arizona Department…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Bartlett v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Klein v. Terra Chemicals International, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Pottinger v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Lemmon v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986