United States v. Chuculate
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Chief Judge:
The present case questions the propriety of the investigating officer’s failure to produce two civilian witnesses for the prosecution at the pretrial investigation.1 One of these witnesses was the object of the indecent assault2 of which appellant was later convicted.
*144This witness, a Mrs. Hill, in company with her friend, Mrs. Abies, being Marine wives, had utilized the base gymnasium facilities during “ladies night.” After a period of exercise, Mrs. Hill went to the outdoor running track in order to complete a mile course. While she ran, the appellant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. MickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. LedbetterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. Chavez-ReyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. ChestnutUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
3Cited by33 opinions
- Marshall Kenneth Flowers v. First Hawaiian Bank, Schofield BranchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. TeeterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. SimoyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.