Legal Opinion

Perkio v. Prunier

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 7, 1981No. 80-379PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues in this case are: at what point in time damages for an attorney’s negligent representation that a parcel of land is free of encumbrances should be measured, and whether a plaintiff may recover for mental suffering as an element of damages in such an action.

In 1974, the plaintiffs, Matti Perkio and Joanne Keurulainen, now Perkio, signed a purchase and sale agreement for a tract of land in New Ipswich, New Hampshire. To obtain financing, they went to a Massachusetts credit union. A Massachusetts attorney contacted the defendant, a New Hampshire attorney, to search the title to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Corso v. MerrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Wilson v. CameSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. Willson v. WillsonSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1852

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weisman v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Vincent v. DeVriesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Caddel v. GatesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API