Legal Opinion

Weisman v. Connors

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 27, 1988No. 34, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

This case primarily concerns the tort of negligent misrepresentation alleged to have arisen from the factual matrix of an arm’s length negotiation of an employment contract.

I

In early April 1981 Arthur Connors and Frederick Weisman, who were previously unknown to each other, met for breakfast at Weisman's townhouse in New York City. Connors at that time was a fifty-six year old vice president of Ford Motor Company, one of about forty vice presidents in Ford’s worldwide operations. A veteran of thirty-two years of service with Ford, he directed a staff of sixty and drew an…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. International Products Co. v. Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Aikens v. DebowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Martin Marietta Corporation v. International Telecommunications Satellite OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  5. T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API